4.4 Article

Concentrations of resveratrol and derivatives in foods and estimation of dietary intake in a Spanish population:: European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Spain cohort

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 188-196

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507882997

Keywords

resveratrol; food composition databases; intake; wine; European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resveratrol has been shown to have beneficial effects on diseases related to oxidant and/or inflammatory processes and extends the lifespan of simple organisms including rodents. The objective of the present study was to estimate the dietary intake of resveratrol and piceid (R&P) present in foods, and to identify the principal dietary sources of these compounds in the Spanish adult population. For this purpose, a food composition database (FCDB) of R&P in Spanish foods was compiled. The study included 40 685 subjects aged 35-64 years from northern and southern regions of Spain who were included in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Spain cohort. Usual food intake was assessed by personal interviews using a computerised version of a validated diet history method. An FCDB with 160 items was compiled. The estimated median and mean of R&P intake were 100 and 933 mu g/d respectively. Approximately, 32 % of the population did not consume R&P. The most abundant of the four stilbenes studied was trans-piceid (53.6 %), followed by trans-resveratrol (20.9 %), cis-piceid (19.3 %) and cis-resveratrol (6.2 %). The most important source of R&P was wines (98.4 %) and grape and grape juices (1.6 %), whereas peanuts, pistachios and berries contributed to less than 0.01 %. For this reason the pattern of intake of R&P was similar to the wine pattern. This is the first time that R&P intake has been estimated in a Mediterranean country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available