4.6 Article

Predictive value of serum human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 concentrations in endometrial carcinoma

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.014

Keywords

CA125; ELISA; endometrial carcinoma; HE4; stage

Funding

  1. Tampere University Hospital [9L062, 9M048, 9N035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of preoperative serum levels of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in the prediction of the presence of metastases in endometrial carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative sera were collected from 98 women with a diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. The concentrations of HE4 and CA125 were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated with the results of the final histopathologic report. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had metastases (>= stage IIIA, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 classification). The serum concentrations of HE4 and CA125 were higher in the group with metastases than in the group without metastases (median [interquartile range], 148.6 pmol/L [71.6-219.1 pmol/L] vs 77.2 pmol/L [52.9-99.3 pmol/L]; P = .001; and 20.0 U/mL [10.1-70.8 U/mL] vs 4.3 U/mL [2.9-10.4 U/mL]; P < .001, respectively). By a multivariate analysis, the combination of HE4 and CA125 (a risk score algorithm) was the only predictive factor for the presence of metastases (odds ratio, 21.562; 95% confidence interval, 5.472-84.963; P < .001), and the grade was the predictor for a deep (>= 50%) myometrial invasion by the tumor (odds ratio, 2.005; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-3.581; P = .019). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the combination of the markers to predict the presence of metastases were 71.4%, 89.5%, 55.6%, and 94.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A combination of preoperative HE4 and CA125 seems to be a better predictor of metastatic disease than either 1 alone in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available