4.6 Article

Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.014

Keywords

indication for induction; induction and cesarean; labor induction; method of induction

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health [HHSN267200603425C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe details of labor induction, including precursors and methods, and associated vaginal delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 208,695 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002 through 2008. RESULTS: Induction occurred in 42.9% of nulliparas and 31.8% of multiparas and elective or no recorded indication for induction at term occurred in 35.5% and 44.1%, respectively. Elective induction at term in multiparas was highly successful (vaginal delivery 97%) compared to nulliparas (76.2%). For all precursors, cesarean delivery was more common in nulliparas in the latent compared to active phase of labor. Regardless of method, vaginal delivery rates were higher with a ripe vs unripe cervix, particularly for multiparas (86.6-100%). CONCLUSION: Induction of labor was a common obstetric intervention. Selecting appropriate candidates and waiting longer for labor to progress into the active phase would make an impact on decreasing the national cesarean delivery rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available