4.6 Article

Maternal BMI, glucose tolerance, and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.035

Keywords

body mass index; gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); glycemia; obesity

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD27915, HD34116, HD40485, HD34208, HD27869, HD40500, HD40560, HD34136, HD40544, HD27860, HD40545, HD53097, HD21410, HD27917, HD40512, HD53118, HD36801]
  2. General Clinical Research Centers [M01-RR00034]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [UL1-RR024989, M01-RR00080, UL1-RR025764, C06-RR11234]
  4. Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development Center at the University of North Carolina [5K12HD050113-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the association of pregravid body mass index (BMI), independent of 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results, with pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: In this secondary analysis of a cohort of women with untreated mild gestational glucose intolerance, which was defined as a 50-g glucose loading test between 135 and 199 mg/dL and fasting glucose level of <95 mg/dL, we modeled the association between pregravid BMI, OGTT results, and both pregnancy complications and neonatal adiposity. RESULTS: Among 1250 participants, both pregravid BMI and glucose at hour 3 of the OGTT were associated with increased risk of gestational hypertension. Maternal pregravid BMI also was associated positively with large-for-gestational-age infants; both maternal BMI and fasting glucose were associated with birthweight z-score and neonatal fat mass. CONCLUSION: Among women with untreated mild gestational glucose intolerance, pregravid BMI is associated with increased gestational hypertension, birthweight, and neonatal fat mass, independent of OGTT values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available