4.6 Article

Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.019

Keywords

cesarean; induction; neonatal outcomes

Funding

  1. University of California San Francisco Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development Award, National Institutes of Health
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K12 HD001262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the association of labor induction and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with term, live births. Women who had induction at a given gestational age (eg, 39 weeks) were compared to delivery at a later gestation (eg, 40, 41, or 42 weeks). RESULTS: Compared to delivery at a later gestational age, those induced at 39 weeks had a lower risk of cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and labor dystocia (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94). Their neonates had lowered risk of having 5-minute Apgar <7 (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), meconium aspiration syndrome (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.48), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97). Similar findings were seen for women who were induced at 40 weeks compared to delivery later. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor in low-risk women at term is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery compared to delivery later.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available