4.6 Article

Benefits and risks of expectant management of severe preeclampsia at less than 26 weeks gestation: the impact of gestational age and severe fetal growth restriction

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.062

Keywords

expectant management; fetal growth restriction; second trimester; severe preeclampsia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine maternal and perinatal outcome in women with severe preeclampsia at < 26 weeks according to gestational age at the onset of expectant management and the presence of severe fetal growth restriction (< 5th percentile). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-one patients (53 fetuses; 2 twins) were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Median prolongation was 7 days (2-55). Maternal morbidity rate was 43%. Perinatal survival rate was 42%. Severe fetal growth restriction complicated 17 fetuses (33%). There were no perinatal survivors in those managed at < 24 weeks (n = 12). For those at 24-24(6/7) and 25-25(6/7) weeks, the perinatal survival rates were 50% and 57%, respectively, and in the presence of severe fetal growth restriction 0% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Perinatal outcome in severe preeclampsia in the midtrimester is dependent on gestational age and/or the presence of severe fetal growth restriction. Given the high maternal morbidity and the extremely low perinatal survival rates, we do not recommend expectant management before 24 weeks and/or in those with severe fetal growth restriction at any gestational age < 26 weeks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available