4.7 Article

Rapid detection and specific differentiation of Salmonella enterica subsp enterica Enteritidis, Typhimurium and its monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i: - by real-time multiplex PCR

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 8-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.10.004

Keywords

Salmonella; Typhimurium; Enteritidis; Real-time PCR; Detection; Validation

Funding

  1. Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), InnoStep [2816801511]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salmonella enterica is one of the most common zoonotic pathogens worldwide causing clinical diseases in human and animal hosts. Targeting a reduction of Salmonella prevalence in poultry, the EU set up a microbiological criterion that demands the absence of S. enterica subsp. enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium including its monophasic variant with seroformula 4,[5],12:i:- in 25 g of poultry neck skin samples and fresh meat according to regulation (EU) no 1086/2011. We developed and in-house validated a method that detects and differentiates these Salmonella serovars based on a 5-plex real-time PCR assay within 24 h after sampling. The inclusivity and exclusivity were between 98 and 99% analysing 456 bacterial strains. Validation according to ISO 16140:2003 against the traditional cultural reference method ISO 6579:2002 was performed using 60 artificially contaminated and 31 presumably naturally contaminated chicken neck skin samples resulting in a relative accuracy of 100%. The detection probability reached 100% between 3 and 5 CFU/25 g sample. We were also able to assign rough and non-motile strains to S. enterica subsp. enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium. In conclusion, we provide diagnostic laboratories a fast and accurate method to monitor these Salmonella serovars in chicken neck skin samples. Other matrices could be easily adapted. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available