4.6 Article

Midpregnancy levels of angiogenic markers in relation to maternal characteristics

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.10.001

Keywords

angiogenic factor; placental growth factor; preeclampsia; soluble endoglin; soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1

Funding

  1. March of Dimes Foundation [20FY01-38, 20-FY04-37]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. National Institute of Nursing Research [R01 HD34543]
  4. Thrasher Research Foundation [02816-7]
  5. Diabetes UK [RD 05-0003099]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U01 DP000143-01]
  7. Institutional T32 grant [T32 HD046377]
  8. Women's Reproductive Health Research Award [5K12HD001255-NIH/NICHD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe relations among maternal demographic and lifestyle characteristics and midpregnancy levels of angiogenic markers (soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, soluble endoglin). STUDY DESIGN: In a large pregnancy cohort, linear models were used to evaluate relations among maternal characteristics and midpregnancy angiogenic markers with and without covariate adjustment. Associations were examined in a subcohort that included term and preterm deliveries (n = 1302) and among normal term pregnancies (n = 668). RESULTS: Concentrations of all factors declined with increasing maternal body mass index. Multiparous women had lower soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 levels than primiparous women. Higher placental growth factor and slightly lower soluble endoglin levels were observed among women who smoked at enrollment, but not among those women who quit before enrollment. African American women had higher levels of all markers. CONCLUSION: Understanding relations among maternal characteristics and levels of angiogenic factors may improve studies that use these markers to examine etiology and/or to predict adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available