4.6 Article

Temperature and irradiance impacts on the growth, pigmentation and photosystem II quantum yields of Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 411-422

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-007-9277-1

Keywords

algal physiology; design of experiments; DOE; microalgae; multivariate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microalga Haematococcus pluvialis Flotow has been the subject of a number of studies concerned with maximizing astaxanthin production for use in animal feeds and for human consumption. Several of these studies have specifically attempted to ascertain the optimal temperature and irradiance combination for growth of H. pluvialis, but there has been a great deal of disagreement between laboratories. Ideal levels of temperature and irradiance have been reported to range from 14 to 28 degrees C and 30 to 200 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1). The objective of the present study was to simultaneously explore temperature and irradiance effects for a single strain of H. pluvialis (UTEX 2505) across an experimental region that encompassed the reported optimal combinations of these factors for multiple strains. To this end, a two-dimensional experimental design based on response surface methodology (RSM) was created. Maximum growth rates for UTEX 2505 were achieved at 27 degrees C and 260 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1), while maximum quantum yield for stable charge separation at PSII (F(v)/F(m)) was achieved at 27 degrees C and 80 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1). Maximum pigment concentrations correlated closely with maximum F(v)/F(m). Numeric optimization of growth rate and F(v)/F(m) produced an optimal combination of 27 degrees C and 250 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1). Polynomial models of the various response surfaces were validated with multiple points and were found to be very useful for predicting several H. pluvialis UTEX 2505 responses across the entire two-dimensional experimental design space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available