Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 200, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.031
Keywords
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; Hybrid Capture 2; metaanalysis; papillomavirus
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the characteristics of human papillomavirus testing, particularly Hybrid Capture 2, in follow-up evaluations after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia for the detection of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade >= 2. STUDY DESIGN: Medline was searched for relevant studies that were published between 1992 and September 2007. Of the 1107 citations that were identified, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Studies that used polymerase chain reaction testing were too heterogeneous to combine. We identified 5 studies that performed both Hybrid Capture 2 and colposcopy. Pooled sensitivity for Hybrid Capture 2 was 90.7% (95% CI, 75.4-96.9%), and pooled specificity was 74.6% (95% CI, 60.4-85.0%). Pooled sensitivity for cervical cytologic testing was 76.6% (95% CI, 62.0-86.8%), and pooled specificity was 89.7% (95% CI, 22.7-99.6%). CONCLUSION: Hybrid Capture 2 testing can identify approximately 91% of women with residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade >= 2; however, approximately 30% of women would undergo colposcopy in follow-up evaluation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available