4.5 Article

Skin infections among Indigenous Australians in an urban setting in Far North Queensland

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 136, Issue 8, Pages 1103-1108

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268807009740

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CRC Programme of the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Technology
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health (Australia) Training Fellowship (NHMRC) [ID 339461]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skin infections are highly prevalent in many Australian Aboriginal communities. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of group A streptococcus (GAS) and Staphylococcus aureus in skin sores of Indigenous people living in an urban setting. We undertook a cross-sectional study of 173 children and Youths attending the Wuchopperen Clinic (Cairns) for treatment of skin infections. Participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, and a skin lesion swab obtained. The median age was 5.3 years, with 42 % identifying themselves as Torres Strait Islanders and 34 % as Aboriginal. Impetigo (65 %) was the most frequent diagnosis reported followed by scabies (19%); 79% of the lesions had erythema and 70% had exudate. Of 118 lesions, 114 were positive or pathogenic bacteria, with GAS isolated in 84 cases and S. aureus in 92; both these species were recovered from 63 lesions. Significant diversity of emm-types of GAS was associated with skin lesions in Indigenous patients (22 emm-types identified). Fifteen of the 92 S. aureus isolates were suggestive of being community-acquired on the basis of antimicrobial susceptibility profile and nine of these strains were co-cultured from nine lesions. These results have implications for future changes of antibiotic policies for the treatment of skin infections in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available