4.5 Article

Semiautomated Volumetric Measurement on Postcontrast MR Imaging for Analysis of Recurrent and Residual Disease in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 498-503

Publisher

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3724

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Aeterna Zentaris
  3. Agenus
  4. Amgen
  5. Bayer and Onyx
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Celldex
  9. Genentech
  10. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
  11. Medimmune
  12. Merck Sharp Dohme
  13. Millenium
  14. Northwest Biotherapeutics
  15. Novartis
  16. Pfizer
  17. Plexxicon
  18. Roche
  19. Sigma Tau
  20. Theorum Clinical Research
  21. Omniprex
  22. American College of Radiation Oncology
  23. American Academy of Neurology
  24. United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties
  25. [R01CA161404]
  26. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A limitation in postoperative monitoring of patients with glioblastoma is the lack of objective measures to quantify residual and recurrent disease. Automated computer-assisted volumetric analysis of contrast-enhancing tissue represents a potential tool to aid the radiologist in following these patients. In this study, we hypothesize that computer-assisted volumetry will show increased precision and speed over conventional 1D and 2D techniques in assessing residual and/or recurrent tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with native glioblastomas with MR imaging performed at 24-48 hours following resection and 2-4 months postoperatively. 1D and 2D measurements were performed by 2 neuroradiologists with Certificates of Added Qualification. Volumetry was performed by using manual segmentation and computer-assisted volumetry, which combines region-based active contours and a level set approach. Tumor response was assessed by using established 1D, 2D, and volumetric standards. Manual and computer-assisted volumetry segmentation times were compared. Interobserver correlation was determined among 1D, 2D, and volumetric techniques. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were analyzed. Discrepancy in disease status between 1D and 2D compared with computer-assisted volumetry was 10.3% (3/29) and 17.2% (5/29), respectively. The mean time for segmentation between manual and computer-assisted volumetry techniques was 9.7 minutes and < 1 minute, respectively (P < .01). Interobserver correlation was highest for volumetric measurements (0.995; 95% CI, 0.990-0.997) compared with 1D (0.826; 95% CI, 0.695-0.904) and 2D (0.905; 95% CI, 0.828-0.948) measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted volumetry provides a reproducible and faster volumetric assessment of enhancing tumor burden, which has implications for monitoring disease progression and quantification of tumor burden in treatment trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available