4.5 Article

Decreased T1 Contrast between Gray Matter and Normal- Appearing White Matter in CADASIL

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 72-76

Publisher

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3639

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondation Planiol
  2. Fondation NRJ-Institut de France
  3. FP6 ERANET NEURON [01 EW1207]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 904] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CADASIL is the most frequent hereditary small-vessel disease of the brain. The clinical impact of various MR imaging markers has been repeatedly studied in this disorder, but alterations of contrast between gray matter and normal-appearing white matter remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contrast alterations between gray matter and normal-appearing white matter on T1-weighted images in patients with CADASIL compared with healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast between gray matter and normal-appearing white matter was assessed by using histogram analyses of 3D T1 high-resolution MR imaging in 23 patients with CADASIL at the initial stage of the disease (Mini-Mental State Examination score > 24 and modified Rankin scale score 1; mean age, 53.5 11.1 years) and 30 age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: T1 contrast between gray matter and normal-appearing white matter was significantly reduced in patients compared with age- and sex-matched controls (patients: 1.35 +/- 0.08 versus controls: 1.43 +/- 0.04, P < 10(-5)). This reduction was mainly driven by a signal decrease in normal-appearing white matter. Contrast loss was strongly related to the volume of white matter hyperintensities. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional 3D T1 imaging shows significant loss of contrast between gray matter and normal-appearing white matter in CADASIL. This probably reflects tissue changes in normal-appearing white matter outside signal abnormalities on T2 or FLAIR sequences. These contrast alterations should be taken into account for image interpretation and postprocessing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available