4.5 Article

Cerebral Microbleeds on MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5 and 7T

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1043-1049

Publisher

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2450

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of microbleeds differs strongly between studies, due to differences in scan protocol. This study aims to compare the visualization of microbleeds with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T with 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (29 male; mean age, 58 +/- 12 years) with atherosclerotic disease from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease study were included. 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T and dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T were done in all patients. The presence and number of definite microbleeds were recorded on minimal intensity projections. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen kappa test and the ICC. The difference in presence and number of microbleeds was tested with the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The interobserver ICC at 7T was 0.61 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.94, whereas at 1.5T the interobserver ICC was 0.50 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.59. Microbleeds were detected in significantly more patients on 7T (50%) than on 1.5T scans (21%) (P = .001). The number of microbleeds was also higher at 7T (median, 0.5; range, 0-5) than on 1.5T (median, 0.0; range, 0-6) (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T results in better and more reliable detection of microbleeds compared with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available