4.5 Article

Quantification of Diffusivities of the Human Cervical Spinal Cord Using a 2D Single-Shot Interleaved Multisection Inner Volume Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar Imaging Technique

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 682-687

Publisher

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1881

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cervical Spine Research Society [2008]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  3. Cumming Foundation
  4. Benning Foundation
  5. Margolis Foundation
  6. National Institutes of Health [R21NS052424, R21EB005705]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DTI is a highly sensitive technique, which can detect pathology not otherwise noted with conventional imaging methods. This paper provides the atlas of reliable normative in vivo DTI parameters in the cervical spinal cord and its potential applications toward quantifying pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, we created a reference of normal diffusivities of the cervical spinal cord by using a 2D ss-IMIV-DWEPI technique from 14 healthy volunteers and compared parameters with those in 8 patients with CSM. The 2D ss-IMIV-DWEPI technique was applied in each subject to acquire diffusion-weighted images. FA, lambda(parallel to), and lambda(perpendicular to) were calculated. A reference of normal DTI indices from 12 regions of interest was created and compared with DTI indices of 8 patients. RESULTS: A map of reference diffusivity values was obtained from healthy controls. We found statistically significant differences in diffusivities between healthy volunteers and patients with CSM with different seventies of disease, by using FA, lambda(parallel to), and lambda(perpendicular to) values. CONCLUSIONS: DTI using 2D ss-IMIV-DWPEI is sensitive to spinal cord pathology. This technique can be used to detect and quantify the degree of pathology within the cervical spinal cord from multiple disease states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available