4.7 Article

Towards understanding the mass-metallicity relation of quasar absorbers:: evidence for bimodality and consequences

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 389, Issue 1, Pages L18-L22

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00513.x

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : haloes; quasars : absorption lines; cosmology : observations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One way to characterize and understand H I-selected galaxies is to study their metallicity properties. In particular, we show that the metallicity of absorbers is a bivariate function of the H I column density (N(H) (I)) and the Mg II equivalent width (W(r)(lambda 2796)). Thus, a selection upon W(r)(lambda 2796) is not equivalent to a H I selection for intervening absorbers. A direct consequence for damped absorbers with log N(H) (I) > 20.3 that falls from the bivariate metallicity distribution is that any correlation between the metallicity [X/H] and velocity width (using W(r)(lambda 2796) as a proxy) cannot be interpreted as a signature of the mass-metallicity relation akin to normal field galaxies. In other words, damped Ly alpha absorber (DLA) samples are intrinsically heterogeneous and the [X/H]-W(r)(lambda 2796) or [X/H]-Delta v correlation reported in the literature arises from the H I cut. On the other hand, a sample of Mg II-selected absorbers, which are statistically dominated by lowest N(H) (I) systems (sub-DLAs) at each W(r)(lambda 2796), is found to have a more uniform metallicity distribution. We postulate that the bivariate distribution [[X/H](N(HI), W(r)(lambda 2796))] can be explained by two different physical origins of absorbers, namely sight lines through the interstellar medium of small galaxies and sight lines through the out-flowing material. Several published results follow from the bivariate [X/H] distribution, namely (i) the properties of the two classes of DLAs, reported by Wolfe et al. and (ii) the constant dust-to-gas ratio for Mg II absorbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available