4.5 Article

Reduction in Protein-Bound Solutes Unacceptable as Marker of Dialysis Efficacy during Alternate-Night Nocturnal Hemodialysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 226-232

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000330176

Keywords

p-Cresol; p-Cresyl sulfate; Indoxyl sulfate; Kinetics; Nocturnal dialysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The uremic retention solutes indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate are linked to cardiovascular disease and overall survival. Dialytic clearances are limited, which is principally attributed to tight protein binding. Extending dialysis duration would be expected to substantially increase protein-bound uremic solute removal. The aim of the current study was to study protein-bound uremic retention solute clearances and kinetics during longer-hours nocturnal hemodialysis. Methods: In a prospective cohort study of 32 maintenance alternate-night nocturnal hemodialysis patients, we followed serum concentrations, solute removals and solute clearances of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate. Spent dialysate sampling was fractionated to compare solute removals between the first 4 h and next 4 h of nocturnal dialysis. Single-compartment variable volume kinetics were calculated. Results: Dialytic clearances of protein-bound uremic retention solutes are maintained during nocturnal (longer-hours) dialysis. Clearances of indoxyl sulfate exceed those of p-cresyl sulfate, presumably due to less tight protein-binding. Apparent distribution volumes increase substantially during nocturnal dialysis, indicative of multi-compartmental behavior of the protein-bound uremic retention solutes indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate. Conclusions: During nocturnal hemodialysis, serum concentrations of protein-bound solute concentrations are reduced less than predicted. Reduction ratios are not a valid tool to estimate total solute removal of protein-bound uremic retention solutes. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available