4.5 Article

Validation of Endogenous Internal Real-Time PCR Controls in Renal Tissues

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 413-417

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000235993

Keywords

Real-time PCR; Kidney disease; Endogenous internal control; Reference gene; Housekeeping gene

Funding

  1. Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation
  2. UAB-UCSD O'Brien Center [1P30 DK079337]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK079337] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endogenous internal controls ('reference' or 'housekeeping' genes) are widely used in real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analyses. Their use relies on the premise of consistently stable expression across studied experimental conditions. Unfortunately, none of these controls fulfills this premise across a wide range of experimental conditions; consequently, none of them can be recommended for universal use. Methods: To determine which endogenous RT-PCR controls are suitable for analyses of renal tissues altered by kidney disease, we studied the expression of 16 commonly used 'reference genes' in 7 mildly and 7 severely affected whole kidney tissues from a well-characterized cystic kidney disease model. Expression levels of these 16 genes, determined by TaqMan (R) RT-PCR analyses and Affymetrix GeneChip (R) arrays, were normalized and tested for overall variance and equivalence of the means. Results: Both statistical approaches and both TaqMan- and GeneChip-based methods converged on 3 out of the 4 top-ranked genes (Ppia, Gapdh and Pgk1) that had the most constant expression levels across the studied phenotypes. Conclusion: A combination of the top-ranked genes will provide a suitable endogenous internal control for similar studies of kidney tissues across a wide range of disease severity. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available