4.1 Article

Administrative reform in China's central government - how much 'learning from the West'?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 351-371

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0020852308095308

Keywords

Chinese public reforms; emulation and learning; imitation; innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevailing interpretation in the scholarly literature is that public sector reform in China during the period of marketization has been driven primarily by internal, contextual factors rather than being under the sway of particular global reform models or theories such as New Public Management. The aim of this article is to move beyond arguing from inference that 'Chinese characteristics' continue to be dominant and to inquire into the manner and extent of external influences on central government reform actors. We assume a 'multi-causal' model in which both internal and external factors are present. From a survey of the literature on the reforms, we conclude that, while there are some 'unique' features, most of the themes (and even the results) of modern Chinese reforms are not unique and have parallels in Western countries. Moreover, aside from the similarities in the content and substance of administrative reforms, the patterns and styles of reform in China and in the West in the past 20 years show marked similarities and parallels. Thus, external reform ideas and influences are being diffused through reform processes. Further empirical and theoretical analysis is required to establish the more specific nature of scanning and dissemination, or other forms of diffusion; the kind of learning that is taking place; and the impact that any imported models or templates actually have on reform proposals and outcomes in particular reform episodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available