4.6 Article

Adherence to Drugs That Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: Meta-analysis on 376,162 Patients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 125, Issue 9, Pages 882-U168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.013

Keywords

Adherence; Cardiovascular disease; Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Combination therapy, specifically with aspirin, cholesterol and blood pressure-lowering drugs, substantially reduces the risk of coronary heart disease, but the full preventive effect is only realized if treatment continues indefinitely. Our objective was to provide a summary estimate of adherence to drugs that prevent coronary heart disease, according to drug class and use in people who have had a myocardial infarction (secondary prevention) and people who have not (primary prevention). METHODS: A meta-analysis of data on 376,162 patients from 20 studies assessing adherence using prescription refill frequency for the following 7 drug classes was performed: aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, thiazides, and statins. Meta-regression was used to examine the effects of age, payment, and treatment duration. RESULTS: The summary estimate for adherence across all studies was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-64) after a median of 24 months. There were statistically significant differences in adherence between primary and secondary prevention: 50% (CI, 45-56) and 66% (CI, 56-75), respectively (P = .012). Adherence was lower for thiazides (42%) than for angiotensin receptor blockers (61%) in primary prevention (P = .02). There were no other statistically significant differences between any of the drug classes in primary or secondary prevention studies. Adherence decreased by 0.15% points/month (P = .07) and was unrelated to age or whether patients paid for their pills. CONCLUSION: Adherence to preventive treatment is poor and little related to class of drug, suggesting that side effects are not the main cause. General, rather than class-specific, measures at improving adherence are needed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2012) 125, 882-887

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available