4.6 Article

Risk of Thiazide-induced Hyponatremia in Patients with Hypertension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 124, Issue 11, Pages 1064-1072

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.031

Keywords

Hypertension; Hyponatremia; Incidence; Thiazide diuretics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Although hyponatremia is a well-recognized complication of treatment with thiazide diuretics, the risk of thiazide-induced hyponatremia remains uncertain in routine care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a multicenter clinical research registry to identify 2613 adult outpatients that were newly treated for hypertension between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 at 2 teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts, and followed them for up to 10 years. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients exposed to ongoing thiazide therapy were compared with 2393 patients who were not exposed. In the exposed group, 66 (30%) developed hyponatremia (sodium <= 130 mmol/L). The adjusted incidence rate of hyponatremia was 140 cases per 1000 person-years for patients treated with thiazides, compared with 87 cases per 1000 person-years in those without thiazides. Patients exposed to thiazides were more likely to develop hyponatremia (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.25). There was no significant difference in the risk of hospitalizations associated with hyponatremia (adjusted rate ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.46-2.32) or mortality (adjusted rate ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-1.42). The number needed to harm (to result in one excess case of incident hyponatremia in 5 years) was 15.02 (95% CI, 7.88-160.30). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3 in 10 patients exposed to thiazides who continue to take them develop hyponatremia. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. . The American Journal of Medicine (2011) 124, 1064-1072

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available