4.6 Article

Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 122, Issue 8, Pages 741-746

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.012

Keywords

Bankruptcy; Health care costs; Health economics

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ [56590]
  2. Harvard Law School
  3. American Association of Retired Persons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Our 2001 study in 5 states found that medical problems contributed to at least 46.2% of all bankruptcies. Since then, health costs and the numbers of un- and underinsured have increased, and bankruptcy laws have tightened. METHODS: We surveyed a random national sample of 2314 bankruptcy filers in 2007, abstracted their court records, and interviewed 1032 of them. We designated bankruptcies as medical based on debtors' stated reasons for filing, income loss due to illness, and the magnitude of their medical debts. RESULTS: Using a conservative definition, 62.1% of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92% of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5000, or 10% of pretax family income. The rest met criteria for medical bankruptcy because they had lost significant income due to illness or mortgaged a home to pay medical bills. Most medical debtors were well educated, owned homes, and had middle-class occupations. Three quarters had health insurance. Using identical definitions in 2001 and 2007, the share of bankruptcies attributable to medical problems rose by 49.6%. In logistic regression analysis controlling for demographic factors, the odds that a bankruptcy had a medical cause was 2.38-fold higher in 2007 than in 2001. CONCLUSIONS: Illness and medical bills contribute to a large and increasing share of US bankruptcies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2009) 122, 741-746

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available