Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 181-190Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1177/1062860613491623
Keywords
human factors; root cause analysis; medical error; HFACS
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In spite of efforts to improve patient safety since the 1999 report, To Error Is Human, recent studies have shown limited progress toward preventing serious error. Most hospitals use root cause analysis as a method of serious event investigation. The authors postulate that this method suffers from 4 problems: (a) the use of root cause analysis is neither standardized nor reliable between organizations, (b) hospitals focus on who did what rather than on why the error occurred, (c) the identified causes are often too nonspecific to develop actionable correction plans, and (d) a standardized nomenclature does not exist to allow analysis of recurring errors across the organization. This article describes the modification of the Human Factors Analysis Classification System based on James Reason's theory of error causation for use in health care. This method resolves the 4 deficiencies noted above. The authors' experience investigating 105 serious events over 2 years is described.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available