4.2 Article

Increased Fracture Risk and Low Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 161, Issue 8, Pages 1910-1914

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36029

Keywords

Loeys-Dietz syndrome; bone mineral density; fractures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loeys-Dietz syndrome is a recently recognized connective tissue disorder with widespread systemic involvement. Little is known about its skeletal phenotype. Our goal was to investigate the risk of fracture and incidence of low bone mineral density in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome. We performed a cross-sectional, descriptive, survey-based study with subsequent chart review from July 2011 to April 2012. Fifty-seven patients (26 men, 31 women) with Loeys-Dietz syndrome confirmed by genetic testing completed the survey (average age, 25.3 years; range, 0.9-79.6 years). There were a total 51 fractures (33 patients): 35 fractures in the upper extremities, 14 in tin lower extremities, and two nu the spine Fourteen patients (24.6%) reported two or more fractures. There was a 50% risk of fracture by age 14 years. The incidence of any fracture in this cohort was 3.86 per 100 person-years, Seventeen patients had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry waits available for review, 11 (64.7%) of whom had at least h he fracture, Thirteen included lumbar spine absorptiometry reports; eight (61.5%) indicated low or very low bone mineral density. In the Left hip, ten of 14: participants (71.4%) had low or very low bone mineral density. In the left femoral neck, nine of 13 participants (69.2%) had low or very low bone mineral density. The lowest Z- and T-scores were not associated with an increased number of fractures. Patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome have a high risk of fracture and a high incidence of low hone mineral density. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available