4.7 Article

Differences in prevalence and patterns of substance use in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 1241-1249

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003329170700236X

Keywords

bipolar disorder; schizophrenia; substance use

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [147787, 167153, 164778/V50]
  2. Eastern Norway Health Authority [123/2004]
  3. Solveig and Johan P. Sommers Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have partly overlapping clinical profiles, which include In over-representation of substance-use behaviour. There are few previous Studies directly comparing substance-use patterns in the two disorders. The objective of the present study was to compare the prevalence of substance use in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, and investigate possible differences in pattern and frequency of use. Method. A total of 336 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum disorder from a catchment area-based hospital service were included in a cross-sectional study. In addition to thorough clinical assessments, patients were interviewed about drug-use history, habits and patterns of use. The prevalence and drug-use patterns were compared between groups. Results. Patients with bipolar disorder bad higher rates of alcohol consumption, while schizophrenia patients more often used centrally Stimulating substances, had more frequent use of non-alcoholic drugs and more often used more than one non-alcoholic drug. Single use of cannabis was more frequent in bipolar disorder. Conclusions. The present Study showed diagnosis-specific patterns of substance use in severe mental disorder. This Suggests a need for more disease-specific treatment strategies, and indicates that substance use may be in important factor in studies of overlapping disease mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available