4.7 Article

Fuel conserving (and using) production functions

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 2184-2235

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006

Keywords

energy efficiency; fuel efficiency; rebound; rebound flexible; production function; cost function; Translog; Generalized Barnett; Generalized McFadden; Gallant; Fourier; Generalized Leontief; Cobb-Douglas; CES; Leontief; conservation; global warming

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article compares eight production/cost functions used or potentially useful for exploring how energy efficiency gains affect energy consumption. We show the practitioner's choice of function can inadvertently pre-determine results, and make recommendations as to which functions are flexible enough to prevent this. We also show pre-selected factor substitution elasticities can similarly pre-determine results. To aid the comparison we decompose the energy consumption rebound effect into intensity and output/income effects, which also delivers insight into the mechanisms of rebound. We conclude by recommending practitioners restrict themselves to either the Gallant (Fourier) or the Generalized Leontief/Symmetric Generalized Barnett cost functions as being sufficiently rebound flexible. The Translog cost function may be suitable given certain conditions and a particular form of the CES (Solow) function is a possible, but problematic, candidate. Along the way, the article provides a general methodology for similarly examining any arbitrarily-de fined constant returns to scale production or cost function. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available