4.6 Article

GFR Decline as an End Point for Clinical Trials in CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 821-835

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030

Keywords

Kidney end point; renal end point; kidney disease outcome; surrogate end point; biomarker; chronic kidney disease (CKD); estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline; eGFR trajectory; renal function; serum creatinine; kidney disease progression; end-stage renal disease (ESRD)

Funding

  1. Baxter
  2. Amgen
  3. Merck
  4. Astra Zeneca
  5. Abbott
  6. MSD
  7. BMS
  8. Novartis
  9. VITAE
  10. Takeda
  11. Hemocuem
  12. JJ
  13. REATA
  14. Astellas
  15. Abbvie
  16. Chemocentryx
  17. Pharmalink AB
  18. Jansen Pharmaceuticals
  19. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
  20. Genkyotex SA
  21. Gilead Sciences
  22. National Institutes of Health
  23. NKF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The US Food and Drug Administration currently accepts halving of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), assessed as doubling of serum creatinine level, as a surrogate end point for the development of kidney failure in clinical trials of kidney disease progression. A doubling of serum creatinine level generally is a late event in chronic kidney disease (CKD); thus, there is great interest in considering alternative end points for clinical trials to shorten their duration, reduce sample size, and extend their conduct to patients with earlier stages of CKD. However, the relationship between lesser declines in GFR and the subsequent development of kidney failure has not been well characterized. The National Kidney Foundation and Food and Drug Administration sponsored a scientific workshop to critically examine available data to determine whether alternative GFR-based end points have sufficiently strong relationships with important clinical outcomes of CKD to be used in clinical trials. Based on a series of meta-analyses of cohorts and clinical trials and simulations of trial designs and analytic methods, the workshop concluded that a confirmed decline in estimated GFR of 30% over 2 to 3 years may be an acceptable surrogate end point in some circumstances, but the pattern of treatment effects on GFR must be examined, specifically acute effects on estimated GFR. An estimated GFR decline of 40% may be more broadly acceptable than a 30% decline across a wider range of baseline GFRs and patterns of treatment effects on GFR. However, there are other circumstances in which these end points could lead to a reduction in statistical power or erroneous conclusions regarding benefits or harms of interventions. We encourage careful consideration of these alternative end points in the design of future clinical trials. (C) 2014 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available