4.6 Article

Proteinuria and Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 417-425

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.08.032

Keywords

Stroke; epidemiology; risk factors; proteinuria; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Banyu Life Science Foundation Fellowship
  2. International Society of Hypertension Visiting Postdoctoral Award
  3. Foundation for High Blood Pressure Research in Australia
  4. fellowship of Heart Foundation of Australia
  5. Royal Australasian College of Physicians Pfizer Cardiovascular Research fellowship
  6. Senior Research Fellowship from the NHMRC of Australia
  7. Principle Research Fellowship of the NHMRC of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The associations between decreased kidney function and cardiovascular disease recently have been established. However, there is uncertainty about the consistency between the independent associations of proteinuria as a risk factor across all cardiovascular end points. We undertook a meta-analysis of published cohort studies to provide a reliable estimate of the strength of association between proteinuria and risk of stroke. Study Design: Meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. Setting & Population: General population of participants with diabetes. Studies were excluded if participants had known glomerular disease or had undergone dialysis or transplantation. Selection Criteria for Studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE. and CINAHL databases were searched for studies that reported age- or multivariate-adjusted risk ratio with some estimate of the variance of the association between proteinuria and risk of stroke, without language restriction. Factor: Proteinuria or albuminuria. Outcomes: Fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: Data from 10 published studies involving 140,231 participants and 3,266 strokes were eligible for inclusion. Participants with proteinuria had a 71% greater risk of stroke compared with those without proteinuria (95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 2.10). There was evidence of significant quantitative heterogeneity in the magnitude of the association across studies (l(2) = 60%; P for heterogeneity 0.008), which was partially explained by differences in methods for measuring proteinuria. The risk of stroke remained significant after adjustment for other vascular risk factors. Limitations: Because individual patient data were unavailable, we were unable to fully examine the impact of adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors on the strength of the association between proteinuria and stroke risk. It is possible that the pooled estimate was affected by regression dilution bias. Conclusions: These findings support the independent relationship between proteinuria and stroke. Additional studies are warranted to determine whether interventions to reduce proteinuria are effective at reducing rates of stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available