4.6 Article

Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation in acute renal failure: A meta-analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 272-284

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.371

Keywords

acute renal failure; ARF; dialysis; hemodialysis; continuous renal replacement therapy; timing; prophylactic; early; late; intensive; mortality; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK065102, R03DK077751] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Some studies have suggested that early institution of renal replacement therapy (RRT) might be associated with improved outcomes in patients with acute renal failure (ARF). Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort comparative studies to assess the effect of early RRT on mortality in patients with ARF. Setting & Population: Hospitalized adult patients with ARF. Selection Criteria for Studies: We searched several databases for studies that compared the effect of early and late RRT initiation on mortality in patients with ARF We included studies of various designs. Intervention: Early RRT as defined in the individual studies. Outcomes: The primary outcome measure was the effect of early RRT on mortality stratified by study design. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for mortality was compiled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by means of subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Results: We identified 23 studies (5 randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective and 16 retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 1 single-arm study with a historic control group). By using meta-analysis of randomized trials, early RRT was associated with a nonsignificant 36% mortality risk reduction (RR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.05; P = 0.08). Conversely, in cohort studies, early RRT was associated with a statistically significant 28% mortality risk reduction (RR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.82; P < 0.001). The overall test for heterogeneity among cohort studies was significant (P = 0.005). Meta-regression yielded no significant associations; however, early dialysis therapy was associated more strongly with lower mortality in smaller studies (n < 100) by means of subgroup analysis. Limitations: Paucity of randomized controlled trials, use of variable definitions of early RRT, and publication bias preclude definitive conclusions. Conclusion: This hypothesis-generating meta-analysis suggests that early initiation of RRT in patients with ARF might be associated with improved survival, calling for an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to address this question.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available