4.5 Article

Influence of internal and outdoor factors on filamentous fungal flora in hematology wards

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 631-637

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.013

Keywords

Filamentous fungi; Aspergillus; hematologic malignancies; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; nosocomial infections; prevention; infection control; environment; meteorologic factors

Funding

  1. Delegation for Clinical Research of Grenoble university hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nosocomial invasive filamentous fungi infections could result from inhalation of filamentous fungi conidia present in hospital environment. Methods: The environmental fungal flora in 3 different hospital wards with similar air conditioning was prospectively studied during 30 months and compared to internal (presence of agranulocytosis patient, behavioral practices, activity, cleaning work) and outdoor factors (meteorologic data, outdoor fungi). The general preventive measures differed from one unit to another. Results: The hematology wards with filamentous fungi preventive measures were significantly less contaminated than a conventional ward without specific measures. internal and outdoor factors influenced the level of fungal flora. However, the influence of internal factors was greater in the conventional ward than in hematology wards. The variation of flora in the hospital environment was seasonal, and the level of this contamination in each ward was influenced by the meteorology However, outdoor factors more readily explain the variations of fungal load in hematology than in the conventional ward. Conclusion: This study highlights that specific preventive measures participate significantly in the control of the filamentous fungal flora intensity due to internal factors but not those due to outdoor factors, stressing the importance of high-efficiency particulate air filtration in high-risk units.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available