4.2 Article

Asbestos Fibers in Para-Aortic and Mesenteric Lymph Nodes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 464-470

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20694

Keywords

asbestos; lymph nodes; mesentery; retroperitoneal fibrosis

Funding

  1. Medical Research Fund of the Tampere University Hospital
  2. Finnish Work Environment Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Asbestos fibers are known to accumulate in lung parenchyma and thoracic lymph nodes, but their presence and translocation into the extrapulmonary tissues need clarification. We assessed the presence of asbestos in the para-aortic (PA) and mesenteric (ME) lymph nodes. Methods PA and ME lymph nodes and lung tissue from 17 persons who underwent medicolegal autopsy for suspicion of asbestos-related disease and from five controls were analyzed for asbestos fibers using transmission electron microscopy. Results High concentrations of amphibole asbestos fibers were detected in several lung tissue samples and in the respective PA and ME lymph nodes. The mean concentration for the 10 persons with a lung asbestos content of >= 1 million fibers/g of dry tissue (f/g) was 0.85 (< 0.05-4.36) million f/g in the PA lymph nodes and 0.55 (< 0.02-2.86) million f/g in the ME lymph nodes. The respective mean values for the 12 persons with a lung asbestos concentration of < 1 million f/g were 0.07 for the PA lymph nodes with 0.03 million f/g for the ME nodes. The lung asbestos burden that predicted the detection of asbestos in abdominal lymph nodes was 0.45 million f/g. Conclusions In addition to their accumulation in lung tissue, asbestos fibers also collect in the retroperitoneal and the mesenteric lymph nodes. Even low-level occupational exposure results in the presence of crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite, or chrysotile in these abdominal lymph nodes. Our results support the hypothesis of lymph drainage as an important translocation mechanism for asbestos in the human body. Am. J. Ind. Med. 52:464-470, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available