4.3 Article

Cognitive Impairment Is Related to Increased Arterial Stiffness and Microvascular Damage in Patients With Never-Treated Essential Hypertension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 525-530

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2009.35

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND It is known that essential hypertension may be implicated in the development of cognitive impairment that is associated to microvascular disease of the brain. It has been hypothesized that increased arterial stiffness of the large arteries may lead to microvascular changes due to increased pulsatile flow. Our study tests the hypothesis that large artery stiffness and microvascular damage are related to brain microcirculation changes as reflected by impaired cognitive function. METHODS We studied 110 nondiabetic patients aged 40-80 years (mean age 53.8 +/- 11.2 years, 57 men) with recently diagnosed stage I-II essential hypertension. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used as a screening test for global cognitive impairment. We performed both 2-D echocardiography and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) in order to evaluate arterial stiffness. Twenty-four hour urine microalbumin excretion was measured as a marker of microvascular damage. RESULTS In the entire population, MMSE was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.42, P < 0.001), 24-h pulse pressure (PP) (r = -0.18, P < 0.05), and PWV (r = -0.3, P = 0.003). Additionally, MMSE was not independently correlated with microalbuminuria in patients aged over 65 years (r = -0.58, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Impaired cognitive function is associated with increased large artery stiffness and microalbumin excretion in newly diagnosed, untreated hypertensive patients. These findings support the hypothesis that cognitive impairment induced by impaired microcirculation is linked to large artery stiffness and microvascular damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available