4.3 Article

Impaired diurnal blood pressure variation and all-cause mortality

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 92-97

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2007.7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Most healthy people exhibit a decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at night. A drop of < 10% from mean daytime values, 11 non-dipping,is associated with kidney disease and cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that non-dipping would predict ail-cause mortality. METHODS Consecutive patients referred for ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring at the Cleveland Clinic between 1994 and 2004 were included. Mean daytime (6 (AM)-11 (PM)) and nighttime (11 (PM)-6 (AM)) SBP values were calculated. We examined diurnal BP variation as a continuous variable, ((Mean daytime SBP - Mean nighttime SBP)/ (Mean daytime SBP)) x 100%, and also as a categorical variable, defining non-dippingas a nocturnal SBP drop of < 10%; subjects who exhibited non-dipping were defined as non-dippers and the others as dippers' All-cause mortality was ascertained from the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS Of the 621 patients included in the study, 261 were dippers and 360 were non-dippers. Non-dippers were older (P < 0.0001), more likely to be non-white (P < 0.05), and had higher rates of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and renal insufficiency (P < 0.01 for all). Over a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, 61 patients died, including 10 dippers (3.8%) and 51 non-dippers (14.2%). The unadjusted hazard ratio for death based upon a decrement in the dipping percentage from the 75th to 25th percentile was 2.22 (95% confidence interval 1.64-2.95; P < 0.0001).This was attenuated after adjustment for comorbid conditions, including mean 24-h SBP and renal function: adjusted hazard ratio 1.62 (1.14-2.24; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Blunted diurnal BP variation is a strong predictor of death, but this may be accounted for, in large part, by its association with other cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available