4.7 Article

What Is the Significance of Difference in Phenotypic Variability across SNP Genotypes?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 390-397

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Public Health Service grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL086718]
  2. U.S. Public Health Service grants from the National Human Genome Research Institute [HG003054, U01HG006382]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Korean Government [NRF-2011-220-C00004]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [220-2011-1-C00004] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the general problem of interpreting and detecting differences in phenotypic variability among the genotypes at a locus, from both a biological and a statistical point of view. The scales on which we measure interval-scale quantitative traits are man-made and have little intrinsic biological relevance. Before claiming a biological interpretation for genotype differences in variance, we should be sure that no monotonic transformation of the data can reduce or eliminate these differences. We show theoretically that for an autosomal diallelic SNP, when the three corresponding means are distinct so that the variance can be expressed as a quadratic function of the mean, there implicitly exists a transformation that will tend to equalize the three variances; we also demonstrate how to find a transformation that will do this. We investigate the validity of Bartlett's test, Box's modification of it, and a modified Levene's test to test for differences in variances when normality does not hold. We find that, although they may detect differences in variability, these tests do not necessarily detect differences in variance. The same is true for permutation tests that use these three statistics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available