4.7 Article

Rare Mutations in XRCC2 Increase the Risk of Breast Cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 734-739

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Council Victoria [628774]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01CA155767, R01CA121245]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [466668]
  4. University of Melbourne
  5. Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative on its Peak Computing Facility at the University of Melbourne [VR00353]
  6. initiative of the Victorian Government
  7. Dutch Cancer Society [UL 2009-4388]
  8. Morris and Horowitz Families Endowment
  9. Spanish Association Against Cancer and Health Ministry [FIS08/1120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An exome-sequencing study of families with multiple breast-cancer-affected individuals identified two families with XRCC2 mutations, one with a protein-truncating mutation and one with a probably deleterious missense mutation. We performed a population-based case-control mutation-screening study that identified six probably pathogenic coding variants in 1,308 cases with early-onset breast cancer and no variants in 1,120 controls (the severity grading was p < 0.02). We also performed additional mutation screening in 689 multiple-case families. We identified ten breast-cancer-affected families with protein-truncating or probably deleterious rare missense variants in XRCC2. Our identification of XRCC2 as a breast cancer susceptibility gene thus increases the proportion of breast cancers that are associated with homologous recombination-DNA-repair dysfunction and Fanconi anemia and could therefore benefit from specific targeted treatments such as PARP (poly ADP ribose polymerase) inhibitors. This study demonstrates the power of massively parallel sequencing for discovering susceptibility genes for common, complex diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available