4.7 Article

Mutations in DDHD2, Encoding an Intracellular Phospholipase A1, Cause a Recessive Form of Complex Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 1073-1081

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Government of Canada through Genome Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-049]
  4. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (VIDI) [917-86-319, 917-96-346]
  5. GENCODYS project (EU) [241995]
  6. Dutch Brain Foundation [2010(1)-30, 2009(1)-22]
  7. Dubai Harvard Foundation for Medical Research
  8. United Arab Emirates University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on four families affected by a clinical presentation of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) due to recessive mutations in DDHD2, encoding one of the three mammalian intracellular phospholipases A(1) (iPLA(1)). The core phenotype of this HSP syndrome consists of very early-onset (<2 years) spastic paraplegia, intellectual disability, and a specific pattern of brain abnormalities on cerebral imaging. An essential role for DDHD2 in the human CNS, and perhaps more specifically in synaptic functioning, is supported by a reduced number of active zones at synaptic terminals in Ddhd-knockdown Drosophila models. All identified mutations affect the protein's DDHD domain, which is vital for its phospholipase activity. In line with the function of DDHD2 in lipid metabolism and its role in the CNS, an abnormal lipid peak indicating accumulation of lipids was detected with cerebral magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which provides an applicable diagnostic biomarker that can distinguish the DDHD2 phenotype from other complex HSP phenotypes. We show that mutations in DDHD2 cause a specific complex HSP subtype (SPG54), thereby linking a member of the PLA(1) family to human neurologic disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available