4.7 Article

RAD21 Mutations Cause a Human Cohesinopathy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 1014-1027

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] [K08HD055488, P01 HD052860]
  2. USA CdLS Foundation
  3. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  4. Cancer Council Victoria Australia [081219]
  5. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1007659]
  6. Marsden grant [UOO0713]
  7. New Zealand Lottery Health Research
  8. Spanish Ministerio de Sanidad [PI091422]
  9. University of Lubeck, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolutionarily conserved cohesin complex was originally described for its role in regulating sister-chromatid cohesion during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesin and its regulatory proteins have been implicated in several human developmental disorders, including Cornelia de Lange (CdLS) and Roberts syndromes. Here we show that human mutations in the integral cohesin structural protein RAD21 result in a congenital phenotype consistent with a cohesinopathy. Children with RAD21 mutations display growth retardation, minor skeletal anomalies, and facial features that overlap findings in individuals with CdLS. Notably, unlike children with mutations in NIPBL, SMC1A, or SMC3, these individuals have much milder cognitive impairment than those with classical CdLS. Mechanistically, these mutations act at the RAD21 interface with the other cohesin proteins STAG2 and SMC1A, impair cellular DNA damage response, and disrupt transcription in a zebrafish model. Our data suggest that, compared to loss-of-function mutations, dominant missense mutations result in more severe functional defects and cause worse structural and cognitive clinical findings. These results underscore the essential role of RAD21 in eukaryotes and emphasize the need for further understanding of the role of cohesin in human development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available