4.7 Article

Ancient Voyaging and Polynesian Origins

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 239-247

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Curie Early Stage Training Grant
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/64233/2009]
  3. European Union
  4. British Academy
  5. Bradshaw Foundation
  6. de Laszlo Foundation
  7. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC96-2627-H-195-001]
  8. National Health Research Institute of Taiwan [NHRI-EX94-9218BI]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Polynesian motif defines a lineage of human mtDNA that is restricted to Austronesian-speaking populations and is almost fixed in Polynesians. It is widely thought to support a rapid dispersal of maternal lineages from Taiwan -4000 years ago (4 ka), but the chronological resolution of existing control-region data is poor, and an East Indonesian origin has also been proposed. By analyzing 157 complete mtDNA genomes, we show that the motif itself most likely originated >6 ka in the vicinity of the Bismarck Archipelago, and its immediate ancestor is >8 ka old and virtually restricted to Near Oceania. This indicates that Polynesian maternal lineages from Island Southeast Asia gained a foothold in Near Oceania much earlier than dispersal from either Taiwan or Indonesia 3-4 ka would predict. However, we find evidence in minor lineages for more recent two-way maternal gene flow between Island Southeast Asia and Near Oceania, likely reflecting movements along a voyaging corridor between them, as previously proposed on archaeological grounds. Small-scale mid-Holocene movements from Island Southeast Asia likely transmitted Austronesian languages to the long-established Southeast Asian colonies in the Bismarcks carrying the Polynesian motif, perhaps also providing the impetus for the expansion into Polynesia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available