4.7 Article

Mutations in C12orf65 in Patients with Encephalomyopathy and a Mitochondrial Translation Defect

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 115-122

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.06.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research Medical Sciences
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011520/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/F011520/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011520/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700718B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the genetic basis for a global and uniform decrease in mitochondrial translation in fibroblasts from patients in two unrelated pedigrees who developed Leigh syndrome, optic atrophy, and ophthalmoplegia. Analysis of the assembly of the oxidative phosphorylation complexes showed severe decreases of complexes I, IV, and V and a smaller decrease in complex III. The steady-state levels of mitochondrial mRNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs were not reduced, nor were those of the mitochondrial translation elongation factors or the protein components of the mitochondrial ribosome. Using homozygosity mapping, we identified a 1 bp deletion in C12orf65 in one patient, and DNA sequence analysis showed a different 1 bp deletion in the second patient. Both mutations predict the same premature stop codon. C12orf65 belongs to a family of four mitochondrial class I peptide release factors, which also includes mtRF1a, mtRF1, and Ict1, all characterized by the presence of a GGQ motif at the active site. However, C12orf65 does not exhibit peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase activity in an in vitro assay with bacterial ribosomes. We suggest that it might play a role in recycling abortive peptidyl-tRNA species, released from the ribosome during the elongation phase of translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available