4.7 Article

On the replication of genetic associations:: Timing can be everything!

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 849-858

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HR-16050, HL04370, N01-HR-16047, P01 HL083069, N01HR16044, N01-HR-16051, N01-HR-16046, P01HL083069, N01-HC-25195, K01 HL004370, N01-HR-16049, U01 HL65899, N01-HR-16048, R37 HL066289, U01 HL065899, N01-HR-16044, N01HC25195, HL066289, N01-HR-16045, N01-HR-16052, R01 HL066289] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD060726] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The failure of researchers to replicate genetic-association findings is most commonly attributed to insufficient statistical power, population stratification, or various forms of between-study heterogeneity or environmental influences.' Here, we illustrate another potential cause for nonreplications that has so far not received much attention in the literature. We illustrate that the strength of a genetic effect can vary by age, causing age-varying associations. If not taken into account during the design and the analysis of a study, age-varying genetic associations can cause nonreplication. By using the 100K SNP scan of the Framingham Heart Study, we identified an age-varying association between a SNP in ROBO1 and obesity and hypothesized an age-gene interaction. This finding was followed up in eight independent samples comprising 13,584 individuals. The association was replicated in five of the eight studies, showing an age-dependent relationship (one-sided combined p = 3.92 x 10(-9), combined p value from pediatric cohorts = 2.21 X 10(-8), combined p value from adult cohorts = 0.00422). Furthermore, this study illustrates that it is difficult for cross-sectional study designs to detect age-varying associations. If the specifics of age- or time-varying genetic effects are not considered in the selection of both the follow-up samples and in the statistical analysis, important genetic associations may be missed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available