4.3 Article

Searching for the Origin of Gagauzes: Inferences from Y-Chromosome Analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 326-336

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20863

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [Ste 325/7]
  2. Russian Federation for Basic Research [03-04-4902, 06-04-48274]
  3. President of the Russian Federation [MD-840.2003.04]
  4. FCI
  5. DAAD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Gagauzes are a small Turkish-speaking ethnic group living mostly in southern Moldova and northeastern Bulgaria. The origin of the Gagauzes is obscure. They may be descendants of the Turkic nomadic tribes from the Eurasian steppes, as suggested by the Steppe hypothesis, or have a complex Anatolian-steppe origin, as postulated by the Seljuk or Anatolian hypothesis. To distinguish these hypotheses, a sample of 89 Y-chromosomes representing two Gagauz populations from the Republic of Moldova was analyzed for 28 binary and seven STR polymorphisms. In the gene pool of the Gagauzes a total of 15 Y-haplogroups were identified, the most common being I-P37 (20.2%), R-M17 (19.1%), G-M201 (13.5%), R-M269 (12.4%), and E-M78 (11.1%). The present Gagauz populations were compared with other Balkan, Anatolian, and Central Asian populations by means of genetic distances, nonmetric multi-dimentional scaling and analyses of molecular variance. The analyses showed that Gagauzes belong to the Balkan populations, suggesting that the Gagauz language represents a case of language replacement in southeastern Europe. Interestingly, the detailed study of microsatellite haplotypes revealed some sharing between the Gagauz and Turkish lineages, providing some support of the hypothesis of the Seljuk origin of the Gagauzes. The faster evolving microsatellite loci showed that the two Gagauz samples investigated do not represent a homogeneous group. This finding matches the cultural and linguistic heterogeneity of the Gagauzes well, suggesting a crucial role of social factors in shaping the Gagauz Y-chromosome pool and possibly also of effects of genetic drift. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21:326-336, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available