4.0 Article

Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale (CRA-J) for Community-Dwelling Cancer Patients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 334-340

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049909109338480

Keywords

palliative care; neoplasms; quality of life; caregiving; home care services; day hospice

Funding

  1. Chiyoda Kenko Kaihatsu Jigyodan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study was to validate the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) among care-givers of community-dwelling advanced cancer patients in Japan. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to advanced cancer patients and their care-givers who were cared for at day hospices and home palliative care services. We translated the CRA into Japanese, and then verified factor validity, reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, and known groups' validity. To address construct and concurrent validity, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Japanese version of the CRA and the Burden Index of Caregivers (BIC). To address known group's validity, we used the t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: A total of 57 caregivers participated in the study. Five factors were extracted (impact on schedule, caregiver's self-esteem,lack of family support, impact on health, and impact on finances) and reliability was good. Construct and concurrent validity among the subscales of the BIC were good. Regarding known groups validity, the subscale score of impact on schedule for the groups that cared 6 hours or more per day was higher than the other group (P = .04). Conclusion: The CRA-J is valid and reliable. This scale is useful for caregivers of-cancer patients in Japan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available