4.6 Article

Discordance between serum cardiac biomarker and immunoglobulin-free light-chain response in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis treated with immune modulatory drugs

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 10, Pages 757-759

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21822

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. Robert A. Kyle Hematologic Malignancies Fund [CA 125614, CA111345, CA062242, CA107476, CA150831, CA93842, CA83724, CA100080, CA100707]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA093842, P50CA100707, R01CA100080, P01CA062242, R01CA125614, R01CA107476, R21CA091561, R01CA083724, P30CA015083, R01CA111345] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the capability of soluble cardiac biomarkers to predict tolerability and outcomes of IMiD-containing treatments among 106 patients treated on clinical trials. Baseline elevations in troponin T (TnT) and N-terminal brain naturietic protein (NT-proBNP) predicted for an inability to tolerate IMiD-based regimens. The best predictors for early attrition during cycle 1 were TnT >= 0.07 mu g/L and NT-proBNP >= 11,939 ng/L. NT-proBNP-response under-performed TnT-response as a predictor for overall survival (OS), but both predicted for early protocol attrition. Despite hematologic response, IMiD-treated patients were at higher risk for NT-proBNP rises and early drug discontinuation than a control population but not for early death. These observations prompt two questions: (1) does IMiD-based therapy lead to increased fluid retention and/or cardiac toxicity and (2) is an NT-proBNP-driven cardiac response system valid in IMiD-treated amyloidosis patients? Recognition of potential drug-induced cardiac toxicity is important so that increased cardiac surveillance and drug dose-adjustment or discontinuation may be implemented. Am. J. Hematol. 85:757-759, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available