4.2 Article

Comparison of cannabis and tobacco withdrawal: Severity and contribution to relapse

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 362-368

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.01.002

Keywords

Cannabis; Marijuana; Withdrawal; Dependence; Tobacco; Smoking cessation; Nicotine

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [T32DA07242, R01 DA012471, T32 DA007242, DA12471] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [K02-00109, K05-00450] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This naturalistic telephone survey study compared perceptions of withdrawal severity in 67 daily cannabis users and 54 daily tobacco cigarette smokers who made quit attempts during the prior 30 days. A Withdrawal symptom Checklist assessed the severity of abstinence symptoms and a Likert scale assessed perceived relations between abstinence symptoms and relapse. A composite Withdrawal Discomfort Score did not differ significantly between groups (M = 13.0 for cannabis, vs. M = 13.2 for tobacco). Individual symptom severity ratings were also of similar magnitude, except craving and sweating were slightly higher for tobacco. Both groups reported that withdrawal contributed substantially to relapse, and the strength of these ratings was similar across groups. The diverse convenience sample examined in this study adds external validity and generalizability to prior studies that included only users not planning to quit or excluded many common types of cannabis users. The comparable withdrawal experience from these heterogeneous cannabis and tobacco users supports previous findings from controlled laboratory Studies and indicates that real-world, frequent cannabis users perceive that withdrawal symptoms negatively affect their desire and ability to quit. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available