4.5 Article

Short-Term Recognition Memory Correlates with Regional CNS Expression of microRNA-138 in Mice

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 461-473

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.09.005

Keywords

MicroRNA; Novel Object Recognition Test; cognitive aging; miR-138; APT1

Funding

  1. Stein Institute for Research on Aging
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [DA031591, MH062512, DA026306, MH074697, MH019934, MH080002]
  4. UC San Diego Center for AIDS Research [AI36214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We hypothesized that microRNA (miR) expression may be involved in memory function because it controls local protein translation at synapses and dendritic spines. Design: Case-control animal study. Methods: We assessed the miR repertoire in the hippocampus of young, 6-month-old (N = 18) mice compared with aged, 26-month-old (N = 23) mice and compared miR quantity to memory scores as determined by the novel object recognition task. We performed a histological brain regional analysis of miR-138, acyl protein thioesterase 1 (APT1) mRNA, and APT1 protein. Results: We found that higher miR-138 expression in the mouse hippocampus is correlated with better memory performance. We also found that APT1 (a depalmytoylation enzyme expressed at dendritic spines whose translation is controlled by miR-138) mRNA is increased in the mouse hippocampal CA1 and dentate gyrus in aged mice compared with young mice, but not in mice with memory impairment. We found APT1 protein distribution to be lower in cells with high miR-138 expression. Conclusions: These results suggest that increased miR-138 is associated with better memory and increased APT1 gene transcription occurs with aging. The role of miR-138 and APT1 protein function in memory and aging warrants further investigation. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013; 21:461-473)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available