Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 10-14Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.134
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety [CIN 13-413]
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K24-04-107]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are increasing. Nonetheless, little is known about the processes related to identification, diagnosis, and referral of patients with NAFLD in routine clinical care. METHODS: Using automated data, we isolated a random sample of patients in a Veterans Administration facility who had >= 2 alanine transaminase (ALT) values >40 IU/ml >6 months apart in the absence of any positive results for hepatitis C RNA, hepatitis B surface antigen, or screens for excess alcohol use. We conducted a structured medical record review to confirm NAFLD and abstracted data from the primary care providers' notes for (i) recognition of abnormal ALT levels, (ii) mention of NAFLD as a possible diagnosis, (iii) recommendations for diet or exercise, and (d) referral to a specialist for further NAFLD evaluation. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we identified patient demographic, clinical, comorbidity, and health-care utilization factors associated with recognition and receipt of early NAFLD care. RESULTS: Of 251 patients identified with NAFLD by our methods, 99 (39.4 %) had documentation in medical record notes of abnormal ALT, 54 (21.5 %) had NAFLD mentioned as a possible diagnosis, 37 (14.7 %) were counseled regarding diet and exercise, and 26 (10.4 %) were referred to a specialist. Only the magnitude of ALT elevation (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for ALT >80 IU/ml vs. <80 IU/ml = 4.4, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 2.65-7.30) and proportion of elevation (adjusted OR for >50 % vs. <50 % of ALT values >40 IU/ml = 1.8, 95 % CI = 1.03-3.14) were associated with receiving specified NAFLD care. Only 3 % of patients at a high risk of fibrosis (NAFLD fibrosis score >0.675) were referred to specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in care who may have NAFLD are not being recognized and evaluated for this condition. Our data suggest that providers may be using an incorrect heuristic in delivering NAFLD care by concentrating on those with high ALT levels.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available