4.7 Article

Survival in stage II/III colorectal cancer is independently predicted by chromosomal and microsatellite instability, but not by specific driver mutations

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages 1785-1793

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.292

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hilton Ludwig Cancer Metastasis Initiative
  2. NHMRC [489418]
  3. Victorian Government through a Victorian Cancer Agency Translation Cancer Research Grant
  4. Victorian Cancer Agency through a Clinical Researcher Fellowship
  5. CSIRO Preventative Health Flagship through a Clinical Researcher Fellowship
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  8. UK Medical Research Council Specialist Training Fellowship in Biomedical Informatics [G0701810]
  9. [090532/Z/09/Z]
  10. MRC [G0701810, MC_UP_A390_1107] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Cancer Research UK [16459] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A390_1107, G0701810] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an established marker of good prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Chromosomal instability (CIN) is strongly negatively associated with MSI and has been shown to be a marker of poor prognosis in a small number of studies. However, a substantial group of double-negative (MSI-/CIN-) CRCs exists. The prognosis of these patients is unclear. Furthermore, MSI and CIN are each associated with specific molecular changes, such as mutations in KRAS and BRAF, that have been associated with prognosis. It is not known which of MSI, CIN, and the specific gene mutations are primary predictors of survival. METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic value (disease-free survival, DFS) of CIN, MSI, mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, FBXW7, and TP53, and chromosome 18q loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) in 822 patients from the VICTOR trial of stage II/III CRC. We followed up promising associations in an Australian community-based cohort (N=375). RESULTS: In the VICTOR patients, no specific mutation was associated with DFS, but individually MSI and CIN showed significant associations after adjusting for stage, age, gender, tumor location, and therapy. A combined analysis of the VICTOR and community-based cohorts showed that MSI and CIN were independent predictors of DFS (for MSI, hazard ratio (HR)=0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.93, and P=0.021; for CIN, HR=1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.08, and P=0.005), and joint CIN/MSI testing significantly improved the prognostic prediction of MSI alone (P=0.028). Higher levels of CIN were monotonically associated with progressively poorer DFS, and a semi-quantitative measure of CIN was a better predictor of outcome than a simple CIN+/- variable. All measures of CIN predicted DFS better than the recently described Watanabe LOH ratio. CONCLUSIONS: MSI and CIN are independent predictors of DFS for stage II/III CRC. Prognostic molecular tests for CRC relapse should currently use MSI and a quantitative measure of CIN rather than specific gene mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available