4.7 Article

Expression and Clinicopathological Significance of Notch Signaling and Cell-Fate Genes in Biliary Tract Cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 126-132

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.305

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a fatal cancer originating from epithelial cells of the intra-and extrahepatic biliary duct system and the gallbladder. Genes and pathways regulating stem and progenitor cells as well as cell-fate decisions are increasingly recognized in tumorigenesis. We evaluated the expression of Notch1, Notch2, and HES1 (hairy and enhancer of split 1), as well as the biliary cell-fate regulators SOX9 (SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9) and HNF1 beta (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta), in BTC for correlation with clinicopathological parameters. METHODS: Tissue microarrays including normal bile ducts and 111 BTCs consisting of 17 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 58 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and 36 gallbladder carcinomas were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Lack of cytoplasmic SOX9 expression was associated with a higher tumor grade (P=0.010) and a significantly reduced overall survival (P=0.002; median 6 months vs. 24 months) in univariate survival analysis, whereas lack of nuclear SOX9 expression was associated with a higher tumor stage (P=0.003). Notch pathway members showed high expression in BTC. However, no correlation was found between cytoplasmic or nuclear Notch1, Notch2, and HES1, as well as HNF1 beta expression, and any of the clinicopathological parameters. In multivariate analysis, cytoplasmic SOX9 expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.031, relative risk=0.571). CONCLUSIONS: We show strong Notch pathway activation and identify SOX9 as a prognostic marker in BTC. These results substantiate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeting developmentally active genes and pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available