4.7 Article

Noninvasive Markers of Liver Fibrosis Are Highly Predictive of Liver-Related Death in a Cohort of HCV-Infected Individuals With and Without HIV Infection

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 1346-1353

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.746

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK56410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis correlate with the stage of liver fibrosis, but have not been widely applied to predict liver-related mortality. METHODS: We assessed the ability of two indices of liver fibrosis, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fib-4, and two markers of extracellular matrix metabolism, hyaluronic acid (HA) and YKL40, to predict liver mortality in a prospective cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals with and without HIV coinfection. These were compared with two established prognostic scores, the Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) and model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores. RESULTS: A total of 303 subjects, of whom 207 were HIV positive at study entry, were followed up for a mean period of 3.1 years. There were 33 deaths due to liver disease. The ability of each test and score to predict 3-year liver mortality was expressed as the area under the receiver operator curve. The area under the receiver operator curve 95% confidence intervals were: HA 0.92 (0.86-0.96), CPT 0.91 (0.79-0.96), APRI 0.88 (0.80-0.93), Fib-4 0.87 (0.77-0.92), MELD 0.84 (71-0.91). In multivariate analyses HA, APRI, and fib-4 were independent predictors of mortality when included in models with MELD or CPT. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis are highly predictive of liver outcome in HCV-infected individuals with and without HIV coinfection. These markers seem to have a prognostic value independent of CPT and MELD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available