4.7 Article

Long-Term Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 890-896

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.53

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 DK 57100-05]
  2. General Clinical Research Centers program, National Center for Research Resources [RR00059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Although biofeedback therapy is effective in the short-term management of dyssynergic defecation, its long-term efficacy is unknown. Our aim was to compare the 1-year outcome of biofeedback (manometric-assisted pelvic relaxation and simulated defecation training) with standard therapy (diet, exercise, laxatives) in patients who completed 3 months of either therapy. METHODS: Stool diaries, visual analog scales (VASs), colonic transit, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion time were assessed at baseline, and at 1 year after each treatment. All subjects were seen at 3-month intervals and received reinforcement. Primary outcome measure (intention-to-treat analysis) was a change in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. Secondary outcome measures included bowel symptoms, changes in dyssynergia, and anorectal function. RESULTS: Of 44 eligible patients with dyssynergic defecation, 26 agreed to participate in the long-term study. All 13 subjects who received biofeedback, and 7 of 13 who received standard therapy, completed 1 year; 6 failed standard therapy. The number of CSBMs per week increased significantly (P < 0.001) in the biofeedback group but not in the standard group. Dyssynergia pattern normalized (P < 0.001), balloon expulsion time improved (P = 0.0009), defecation index increased (P < 0.001), and colonic transit time normalized (P = 0.01) only in the biofeedback group. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy provided sustained improvement of bowel symptoms and anorectal function in constipated subjects with dyssynergic defecation, whereas standard therapy was largely ineffective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available